The Menendez brothers case is a widely known example of child abuse and the possible consequences. Lyle and Erik Menendez are notorious for the murder of their parents. The boys claimed that they suffered immense amounts of abuse growing up, however a new show on Netflix dug deep into the relationship of Erik and Lyle, as well as a play by play of their crimes and lies. 

Monsters: The Story of Lyle and Erik Menendez aired on Netflix September 19, 2025. The show is about the true story of Lyle and Erik Menendez, two brothers who were convicted of murdering their parents, José and Kitty Menendez, in 1989. The series delves into the complex family dynamics, the brothers’ troubled past, and the sensational trial that captivated the nation. It explores the psychological and emotional aspects of the case, providing a deep insight into what led the brothers to commit such a heinous crime and the subsequent legal battles they faced.

The new show has received a mix of reactions from viewers and critics. Many people are fascinated by the detailed portrayal of the famous case, appreciating the show’s exploration of the brothers’ backgrounds and the psychological aspects of their actions. Some viewers are also intrigued by the dramatic retelling and the strong performances by the cast, which bring a fresh perspective to a well-known story. However, others feel that the show sensationalizes a tragic event and question the ethical implications of turning such a crime into entertainment. Overall, the series has sparked significant discussion and debate, reflecting the enduring intrigue surrounding the Menendez case.

The debate over the Menendez Brothers case remains intense and controversial. On one side, some argue that Lyle and Erik Menendez were victims of severe abuse and acted out of desperation, believing their lives were in danger. This perspective highlights the psychological trauma they endured and views their actions as a tragic consequence of their upbringing. 

On the other hand, critics say that the brothers were motivated by greed and a desire to inherit their parents’ wealth, pointing to the premeditated crime and their lavish spending after the murders. This debate is further fueled by differing opinions on the fairness of their trial and the adequacy of their legal defense, making the case a complex and enduring topic of discussion.

While the show was thought to be used for educational and entertainment purposes, all the show did was add more fuel to the debate. By heavily dramatizing the events, it brought renewed attention to the complexities of the case. Erik Menendez himself called the show a “disheartening slander.” Menendez says the show is all a blatant lie and should not be used for the portrayal of the true story if it’s going to be this naïve and inaccurate. 

Some viewers felt that it provided a more empathetic view of Lyle and Erik, shedding light on the abuse they allegedly suffered. Others, however, believed that the show might have romanticized or sensationalized the crime, potentially swaying public opinion. Overall, the show reignited discussions and made people reexamine their perspectives on the Menendez Brothers case.